Thursday 26 February 2009

Is this why the NSPCC are making false allegations?

The NSPCC have been very vocal in making completely false and unsubstantiated allegations that home education could be used as a cover for abuse, presenting themselves as an expert authority on protecting children from harm. They very often refer to the Victoria Climbie case as an example of why monitoring and control by the authorities is needed.

Yet it turns out that the NSPCC were largely responsible for the failure to protect poor Victoria, she was referred to them as an urgent case but they were too busy planning a party to check up on her!! HOW DARE THEY FALSELY ACCUSE PARENTS OF ABUSING CHILDREN when they have been complicit in allowing this child to be abused and killed.

When the whole sorry case came out into the open they even altered documents to try to hide their failure.

The NSPCC should be taken apart and all the self seeking career animals chucked out so that we can once more have an organisation that truly cares more for children than its own status as 'an important organisation advising government'.

READ MORE at:-
http://sometimesitspeaceful.blogspot.com/2009/02/hey-vijay.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/1827406.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1382707/NSPCC-accused-of-cover-up-after-Climbie-murder.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1382670/NSPCC-ignored-Victorias-abuse.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Climbi%C3%A9
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/reports/archive/features/nspcc.shtml

1 comment: